Wild Animals Should NOT Be Kept in Captivity - 2736 Words.
Wild animals were made to be free, and free is what they should be. One of the main arguments that zoos use for keeping animals held in captivity is the claim that zoos are needed for educational purposes. Although this may seem like a legitimate argument, it is not an ethical enough reason to deprive wild animals of their freedom. “Besides.Animals Should Not Be Kept In Captivity At Zoos Essay Sample. Many of us have been to a zoo at least once in our lives before. Zoos are premises for the captivity of animals, where they are studied and displayed for the public to see.For many years people have argued if killer whales should be kept in captivity or not. Blackfish, a documentary on Seaworld and killer whales, had argued with Seaworld against whale captivity. Killer whale captivity must be banned because whales can get ill or injured, they can be dangerous to humans, and they can get separated from their.
It just so happens that by putting these animals into captivity, we are causing more damage to them, just as damage is occurring in the wild and more species are becoming extinct. Animals should not be held in captivity; it does not save them from going extinct, but helps kill them off. The first zoo in the United States was established in 1874.Whether animals are to be kept in Zoos or let them live in forests is a debatable issue. There are mixed opinions of people around the globe. Some people think that animals should be kept in the zoo for their better living, while on the contrary, some say that animals should not be kept in cages, instead they should be kept free in natural.
Should Animals Be Kept In Zoos The debate of whether or not confining of animals is right in zoos is a popular one that attracts both opponents and proponents. The increased interests in science and natural history saw the introduction of zoos in 1763, which facilitated up close animal studies and would provide a chance for entertaining and educating the public.
